<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Direct and Indirect Objects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/2007/08/30/direct-and-indirect-objects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/2007/08/30/direct-and-indirect-objects/</link>
	<description>Crunchy Freaks R Us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:02:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: raymond pert</title>
		<link>http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/2007/08/30/direct-and-indirect-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-5197</link>
		<dc:creator>raymond pert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 03:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/?p=620#comment-5197</guid>
		<description>I would love to see such a lesson work with the transitive verb lay and the intransitive verb lie.

The word lay, in the present tense always should have a direct object.

The word lie, in the present tense never has a direct object.

So, in keeping with your sexy example, I would think that students could remember that, grammatically speaking, when one lays someone, there is an agent of the deed and a grammatical recipient.  Someone gets laid.

But with lie, as in &quot;I&#039;m going to lie down&quot;, no one gets laid.

So you can lay carpet, lay linoleum, lay your lover, but you don&#039;t get tired and lay down.  

You lie down.

I know you know this, but i&#039;m an English teacher and I was just trying out a lesson.  

No lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see such a lesson work with the transitive verb lay and the intransitive verb lie.</p>
<p>The word lay, in the present tense always should have a direct object.</p>
<p>The word lie, in the present tense never has a direct object.</p>
<p>So, in keeping with your sexy example, I would think that students could remember that, grammatically speaking, when one lays someone, there is an agent of the deed and a grammatical recipient.  Someone gets laid.</p>
<p>But with lie, as in &#8220;I&#8217;m going to lie down&#8221;, no one gets laid.</p>
<p>So you can lay carpet, lay linoleum, lay your lover, but you don&#8217;t get tired and lay down.  </p>
<p>You lie down.</p>
<p>I know you know this, but i&#8217;m an English teacher and I was just trying out a lesson.  </p>
<p>No lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/2007/08/30/direct-and-indirect-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-5126</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/?p=620#comment-5126</guid>
		<description>&quot;Except if you turn the sentence into “He did her a favor” her becomes the indirect object. What he is actually doing is the favor, and he is doing it for her, so the example doesn’t hold up any more.&quot;

Oh fine, be right then. See if I care.   ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Except if you turn the sentence into “He did her a favor” her becomes the indirect object. What he is actually doing is the favor, and he is doing it for her, so the example doesn’t hold up any more.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh fine, be right then. See if I care.   <img src='http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacie</title>
		<link>http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/2007/08/30/direct-and-indirect-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-5116</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/?p=620#comment-5116</guid>
		<description>Ah, you&#039;ve got me on a technicality.  However, since I use this kind of trick to teach Latin and am always looking for a tricks to help translation (translate the dative, which is the indirect object more often than not, with &quot;to&quot; or &quot;for&quot; in this case) it still has pedagogical possibilities.

&lt;b{He threw her&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;He threw her the book&lt;/b&gt; perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, you&#8217;ve got me on a technicality.  However, since I use this kind of trick to teach Latin and am always looking for a tricks to help translation (translate the dative, which is the indirect object more often than not, with &#8220;to&#8221; or &#8220;for&#8221; in this case) it still has pedagogical possibilities.</p>
<p><b {He threw her</b> and </b><b>He threw her the book</b> perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becca34</title>
		<link>http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/2007/08/30/direct-and-indirect-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-5110</link>
		<dc:creator>Becca34</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 05:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/?p=620#comment-5110</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t &quot;her&quot; in your second sentence actually be the object of the preposition, not the indirect object? (Since &quot;to&quot; is a preposition...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t &#8220;her&#8221; in your second sentence actually be the object of the preposition, not the indirect object? (Since &#8220;to&#8221; is a preposition&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swistle</title>
		<link>http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/2007/08/30/direct-and-indirect-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-5024</link>
		<dc:creator>Swistle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/?p=620#comment-5024</guid>
		<description>I had one high school teacher who used this sort of thing in her teaching.  I remember EVERY SINGLE THING SHE EVER SAID.  I&#039;ll bet the rest of the class does, too.  I ran into an old classmate the other day, and I said, &quot;I still remember how to spell &#039;rhythm&#039; by saying...&quot; and we finished together: &quot;...ride hard, you thick-headed monster.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had one high school teacher who used this sort of thing in her teaching.  I remember EVERY SINGLE THING SHE EVER SAID.  I&#8217;ll bet the rest of the class does, too.  I ran into an old classmate the other day, and I said, &#8220;I still remember how to spell &#8216;rhythm&#8217; by saying&#8230;&#8221; and we finished together: &#8220;&#8230;ride hard, you thick-headed monster.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacie</title>
		<link>http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/2007/08/30/direct-and-indirect-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-5023</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/?p=620#comment-5023</guid>
		<description>Except if you turn the sentence into &quot;He did her a favor&quot; &lt;b&gt;her&lt;/b&gt; becomes the indirect object.  What he is actually doing is the favor, and he is doing it &lt;b&gt;for&lt;/b&gt; her, so the example doesn&#039;t hold up any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except if you turn the sentence into &#8220;He did her a favor&#8221; <b>her</b> becomes the indirect object.  What he is actually doing is the favor, and he is doing it <b>for</b> her, so the example doesn&#8217;t hold up any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/2007/08/30/direct-and-indirect-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-5022</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/?p=620#comment-5022</guid>
		<description>Oooops...I meant at the end, not the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooops&#8230;I meant at the end, not the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/2007/08/30/direct-and-indirect-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-5021</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/?p=620#comment-5021</guid>
		<description>Just tell the board you forgot the add &quot;...a favor.&quot; at the beginning. It was an innocent mistake, really!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just tell the board you forgot the add &#8220;&#8230;a favor.&#8221; at the beginning. It was an innocent mistake, really!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacie</title>
		<link>http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/2007/08/30/direct-and-indirect-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-5020</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/?p=620#comment-5020</guid>
		<description>Jennie -- What, you WANTED me to get fired?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennie &#8212; What, you WANTED me to get fired?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/2007/08/30/direct-and-indirect-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-5018</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twinkies.bastetweb.com/?p=620#comment-5018</guid>
		<description>hee hee hee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hee hee hee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
