YMCA and Canada Human Rights Commission Violate Law
OK, I can’t really get bent out of shape about the Facebook thing, and I don’t have a lot of sympathy for the woman who wants yet more accomodations while she takes her medical exams again after failing them the first time. Life is short and I can’t muster indignity for everything. However, the incident at the Canada YMCA really bothers me.
Carolynn was nursing at a Y in Canada while watching her older children’s swimming lesson. She was approached by a staff member who asked her to move to a more private location because the Y was “a family-oriented place.” When Carolynn stood her ground and refused to move the employee left and returned, reporting that “her supervisor, Sherri Perez, told her that my right to breastfeed did not extend to the Y.” Later the staff admitted that “no person had complained, but that the staff had collectively agreed that my breastfeeding was indecent, that they were incredulous that I would breastfeed there, and that something should be said to me.”
Mind you, this is all happening in a city in which, as I recall from when I lived there, a woman may legally be topless anywhere a man is not required to wear a shirt.
So, the nursing mother contacts a lawyer and the Ontario Human Rights Commission. According to the OHRC’s web site:
You have rights as a nursing mother. For example, you have the right to breastfeed a child in a public area. No one should prevent you from nursing your child simply because you are in a public area. They should not ask you to “cover up”, disturb you, or ask you to move to another area that is more “discreet”.(source)
Alas, the woman at the OHRC did not appear to be up to date on the law and informed the mother that breastfeeding was not, in fact, appropriate everywhere and since she had been offered a more discreet location there was no human rights violation.
What is it with people lately not reading the laws?
You can follow this story via Carolynn’s blog, set up specifically to track the progress of this case.
September 14th, 2007 12:32
I find it amusing that the little ad on the top of your blog has consistently been for ‘hooter hiders’, a $35 dollar product which will help you avoid this sort of situation. If you have some reason to spend $35 on what appears to be a blanket with a handle….
LOL you can tell i clicked on the ad, but that is all for a good cause. Look i am going to click on it again! Click click!
September 14th, 2007 14:45
I am trying to breathe calmly and not start getting involved. I’m still all worked up about the Applebee’s thing. I just can’t believe all this stuff keeps happening! The law is SO CLEAR! How can there be any problem? And “family-oriented”? Like FEEDING BABIES, maybe? It’s exactly BECAUSE it’s family-oriented that I’d feel pretty comfortable breastfeeding a baby there. Okay, back to the attempt to breathe calmly.
September 14th, 2007 15:55
I’m not sure how being a family-oriented place can say that feeding your child is not family-oriented. I live in the states and we’re much more prudish about covering up (at least real people – famous people don’t count), so having a law that women can go shirtless wherever men can, is great! I’d never do it, but it seems reasonable to me!
September 14th, 2007 16:12
If women can go shirtless wherever men can, she is also protected by that law, isn’t she? (I am assuming men are not asked to swim fully clothed.) Apparently, the Y is breaking two laws with one stone.
September 14th, 2007 19:40
And the YMCA is a Christian organization. *shakes head* I don’t know whether they all have the same motto, but ours is “The five core values are emphasized in all programs: Respect, Responsibility, Honesty, Caring and Faith.” Guess they dropped the ball on a couple of those, huh?
September 17th, 2007 07:20
[...] link via the Twinkies [...]