Montessori, Home Schooling and High School
I’m a John Taylor Gatto fan. For those of you who don’t read radical educational theorists for fun he is an award winning public school teacher most famous for his work Dumbing Us Down in which he argues that the current model of public schooling is not a failure; it is not designed to turn out free thinking members of a democratic society but rather factory workers who show up on time, do what they are told and don’t question authority. It’s doing that quite well. This set up is, of course, inherently classist because if you can afford it you can BUY your child an education that teaches children to work alone without guidance, to challenge prevailing assumptions, to (gasp) think for themselves. If you can’t, you’re stuck with a public school system that is not all that fond of children who challenge authority.
Home schooling is an option for some. I know that there is a popular conception that home schooled kids are poorly-socialized religious zealots who can spell appoggiatura1 without batting an eye. However, I’ve had home schooled kids in my classroom and in general they seem mature, self-motivated and respectful without being overawed or intimidated by authority.
I, however, am not cut out to home school. Some people are. Those people tend to murmur things about how you never know what you can do until you try it but I’m fairly confident I’m self-aware enough to know I’d hate home schooling. I miss the adult workplace. I love seeing the kids but being home all day makes me batty to the point that I am creating vague facsimiles of adult work to keep me sane. The idea of trying to do this for another decade is not a happy one. If the mother is miserable I don’t think home schooling can possibly be a positive experience.
So, once I cast aside the idea of home schooling – if one can be said to cast aside an idea one has never really had – I looked at alternative educational structures. There were three biggies: Sudbury, Waldorf and Montessori.
Sudbury schools are democratic schools. Students initiate their own activities with staff acting as facilitators and students participate in the governance of the school. Having gone to a similar school where I did algebra and read Shakespeare in grade 5 I know that children can, and do, gravitate to interesting, difficult work when given a chance. However, the only Sudbury school near us is just starting out and doesn’t have the resources of the original.
I was originally very attracted to the arts-centered education you find in a Waldorf school. However, the number of organized critics of the methodology gave me pause, particularly when I read their concerns, and there isn’t one within an hour of us anyway. Plus, Anthroposophy leaves me cold as does the fact that many Waldorf schools – including the one “near” me – either neglect to mention or gloss over the itsy bitsy issue that their curriculum is rooted in religion.
So that left Montessori. I went to a Montessori school (I changed schools a lot – I’ve experienced many differing theories of education from the student perspective) and recall rather liking it. I like the multi-age classrooms, the emphasis on self-paced learning and the prepared environment. There are a LOT of Montessori schools around us and the one we picked, The Cobb School, is gorgeous. The physical plant is amazing and the whole school is filled with light and every classroom has direct access to the outdoors. When I went for a visit I was blown away; the kids were happy, engaged and working independently. Two five-year-olds introduced themselves to me, asked if I would like some tea, and proceeded to make me some. I was offered a selection of tea bags, they timed an electric kettle, poured the hot water into a little pot and brought me tray with the teapot, a cup, a doily, a spoon a napkin and a small flower. Did I mention they were five? Did I mention how every space was filled with sunshine? I know I’ve mentioned the help with potty training in the toddler room. The kids aren’t allowed to wear clothing with large graphics or writing, eliminating logos and Dora the Explorer. They ask that when you bring in birthday treats you limit yourself to fruit to support the school’s commitment to good nutrition. Finally, the research seems to indicate that Montessori children do very well later in their schooling compared to students in traditional public schools. 2 It’s the perfect blend, at least before we actually start, of my quasi-crunchy ways and obsession with education.
You did note that I read educational theorists for fun, right?
Of course, eventually there is high school. On this front I’m a fan of Leon Botstein, president of my alma mater and a man with a flair for a bow tie. He argues for abolishing high school altogether, believing that “teens are as capable as adults in many respects and that they are certainly capable of learning important and interesting things. High school … demeans the young, wastes their time, traps them in the vacuous world of teen culture, turns them off to learning and isolates them from and makes them hostile toward the very people they are about to become: adults.” 3 Fortunately, I don’t have to deal with how to reconcile my feelings about the general uselessness of high school and my own children’s education for a few years.
Well. You asked. I’m a big bore on education. My mother was a teacher. My step-mother was a teacher. My grandmother was a teacher. “Opinionated” doesn’t even begin to describe me on this topic. I haven’t even branched out into No Child Left Behind (dreadful – just dreadful), teacher certification (if you think this ensures quality teachers you are deluding yourself) or grades (oy!).
1 That would be the winning word from the 2005 Scripps Howard National Spelling Bee. It means “in music, an ornamental note of long or short duration that temporarily displaces, and subsequently resolves into, a main note, usually by stepwise motion.” (source) Of course, you knew that. I had to look it up.
2 “On several dimensions, children at a public inner city Montessori school had superior outcomes relative to a sample of Montessori applicants who, because of a random lottery, attended other schools. By the end of kindergarten, the Montessori children performed better on standardized tests of reading and math, engaged in positive interaction on the playground more, and showed advanced social cognition and executive control more. They also showed more concern for fairness and justice. At the end of elementary school, Montessori children wrote more creative essays with more complex sentence structures, selected more positive responses to social dilemmas, and reported feeling more of a sense of community at their school.” (source)
3(source) How do I reconcile feeling that high school should be abolished with being a high school teacher? Though I will do my best to pull my own kids out of the conventional schooling system I also try to work within it to effect change. Gatto spent 30 years within the system before he washed his hands of it entirely. Get back to me in 25 years and I’ll let you know whether I am still mostly on the “work within the system” team or whether I have moved entirely to the “abolish the system and start again” team. Right now I think the latter is unrealistic.
January 23rd, 2008 13:19
I’m an education freak myself. At least a little. It’s where I spent my grad school years.
I think C’s school is something of a Sudbury-ish place, based on your description. I’d never heard of Sudbury before, though.
I wonder if at the high school age, home schooling might be more do-able for you.
I’m planning to send my kids to public high schools. I am hoping that their independence, basic skills, and naturally high IQ’s will help them through the haze that is high school.
Get back to me in about 7 years. (eek, is that all?)
January 23rd, 2008 17:34
How interesting. We sent my daughter to a Steiner (Waldorf) daycare for 2-5s – they had two rooms, the indoor/outdoor setup you mention, and the very arts/creative focus of the Waldorf system. I liked it because unlike the conventional daycares we had already rejected as not providing anything more than we could with our nanny at home, it wasn’t brightly coloured over-stimulating rooms filled with heaps of unsorted plastic toys. The kids did free play inside with crafts when they arrived, or outdoor free play (they even had a tree which they were encouraged to climb, which made me very happy). Then circle time, stories, more craft, and lots of imaginative play.
My husband’s older daughter went through the Steiner system for almost her entire schooling and while it suited her (being very artistic) I didn’t want to continue with it when my daughter went to school. Mainly because the kindy she went to took the best elements of the system without the culty bits. There were no pictures of Mr Steiner, for one. The same couldn’t be said for the closest Steiner primary school.
We’re very happy with her public school. It is a small inner-city school with a focus on literacy and performing arts, with a young, ambitious and smart principal. She’s starting year 1 (next week! eeek) and we couldn’t be happier with the way they have dealt with the huge range of abilities, social skills, and personalities in her year.
The Cobb School sounds wonderful. You are very lucky to have such a gorgeous school within reach.
January 23rd, 2008 19:29
In a few years I will be starting the search for a good school. Homeschooling is my preference, and I think I could do it easily if we could forgo my income, but that is extremely unlikely. But mainly I wanted to comment on what you said about high school being a waste of time. The intellectual skills of teenagers are phenomenal and I’d hate to see us lose the opportunity to engage them in this way. (I’ve seen what they can do when they are at their best and it firmly convinces me high schools can be the best place for many, many teens.) It’s middle school that I think is the waste of time. This age would be served so much better by community projects and apprenticeships. If students didn’t waste the developmentally rich time of early adolescence inside a school building, their attitude and participation in high school would be so much better.
January 23rd, 2008 21:18
Thank you! We’re in the process of researching schools and such now. I’d been leaning towards Montessori because it “felt right” but it’s nice to have some theory behind that. I’m going to look into it further.
January 23rd, 2008 22:06
What are your thoughts on Charter schools? I’m sure they’re all different but in general…
January 24th, 2008 08:35
I appreciate your educated analysis of these schooling systems. Personally, I do like the Montessori system and the community surrounding it. But I have to admit that your description of the kids bringing you tea is a bit spooky. In my opinion, it sounds like a cheesy gimmick (I mean, come on, a doily and a flower?) solely meant to impress potential customers (which is a common real world stunt, now that I think about it, so I suppose a real world lesson?). Other than that little tidbet, The Cobb School sounds wonderful… especially the large, bright classrooms and emphasis on nutrition. I wish this nation cared enough about kids’ health to mandate healthy food in all classrooms.
January 24th, 2008 13:31
Sarah – I know it sounds a bit odd and one of the big criticisms of Montessori is that the kids are so calm and polite it doesn’t seem real but I honestly don’t think it was staged. I was specifically told to NOT interact with the children when I observed a class unless they came up to me and learning practical life skills is a big component of Montessori. The children prepare their own snacks and clean up afterwards. While I was there one boy was very seriously cutting a banana into neat slices. I suspect rather than being a gimmick to entice new parents – this place has a waiting list and isn’t hurting for students even with ll the Montessori schools in this area – the tea thing happened because the students had recently learned how to make it in class and wanted a new victim to practice their skill on. I can see that is sounds a little Stepford Toddler-ish but that wasn’t actually the vibe at all.
Kerry – I don’t know anything about Charter schools at all. In general I suspect that they vary wildly.
January 24th, 2008 15:19
Thanks for this insightful post. My twinkies will be a year old tomorrow and you have got me thinking about our future…hmm…they just grow so fast!
January 24th, 2008 20:11
Damn* you for getting me to read Gatto. Now I have to give serious thought to educating my children.
*Damn = thanks in this context. Mostly.
January 25th, 2008 12:03
Chloe is in a Montessori now & loves it, i am very pleased. I went to Montessori myself, as did my dh, actually. Mind you, there is a huge range in what people call ‘Montessori’ and you have to be careful. I did well, dh did very poorly. Alexander (my oldest) did not do that well, his was more of a Montessori-lite experience whereas Chloe’s is q
January 25th, 2008 12:09
whoops. continuing.
….quite strict. They just opened so we were a bit hesitant but she is really blossoming there. I certainly hope they stay open so i can send my boys there!
I have looked into Waldorf on occasion — the natural/arts thing is very appealing. Yet i have never been convinced by it. Currently Alexander goes to a Jesuit boy’s school for high school, of all things. I had never previously been a fan of religious-based/same-sex education but it is very effective for him. So, you know, i am pragmatic in these things — go with what works. And homeschooling has never been an option for us — i can’t teach my kids anything at all, it seems!
January 26th, 2008 00:20
How strange, I stumbled across your blog from a link from “Til my head falls off”, just today. Both my husband and I are Bardians, and he got his MAT there in 2005-2006.